aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/book/en/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-07-22Merge #502bors[bot]
502: book/resources: highlight that `#[lock_free]` includes a compile-time check r=AfoHT a=japaric for the "same priority requirement"; this prevents data races Co-authored-by: Jorge Aparicio <jorge.aparicio@ferrous-systems.com>
2021-07-22Merge #500bors[bot]
500: migration/0.5: cover #[lock_free] r=AfoHT a=japaric I think this completes #488 Co-authored-by: Jorge Aparicio <jorge.aparicio@ferrous-systems.com>
2021-07-22book/resources: highlight that `#[lock_free]` includes a compile-time checkJorge Aparicio
for the "same priority requirement"; this prevents data races
2021-07-22migration/0.5: cover #[lock_free]Jorge Aparicio
I think this completes #488
2021-07-22book/resources: rm #[task_local] mention; add #[lock_free] exampleJorge Aparicio
the #[task_local] attribute was removed
2021-07-21book/resources: remove mentions of the field attribute #[init(<expr>)]Jorge Aparicio
it no longer exists. all resources are now late resources
2021-07-21book/resources: do not use the lock API in the very first exampleJorge Aparicio
instead stick to `#[local]` resources
2021-07-21use tuple struct syntax for Monotonics everywhereJorge Aparicio
2021-07-21update the 0.5.x -> 0.6.0 migration guideJorge Aparicio
to use the new resources syntax I also reordered the sections to cover all the resource API first before covering the spawn API I've also added a section about the old `static mut` variable transform
2021-07-20Change misleading documentation left over by PR #464Valentin Ochs
2021-07-09const genericsAndrey Zgarbul
2021-07-01Fix syntax error in migration guideAlex Martens
2021-04-22Merge #479bors[bot]
479: book: detail import resolving for 0.6 migration r=korken89 a=tmplt That is, answering the question of why imports are no longer resolving during compilation. Co-authored-by: Viktor Sonesten <v@tmplt.dev>
2021-04-21book/migration/v5: update init signature, fix example syntaxViktor Sonesten
The example now migrates from v5 to v6 instead of an incorrect v6 syntax to a another incorrect v6 syntax.
2021-04-21book: detail import resolving for 0.6 migrationViktor Sonesten
2021-04-21book: update outdated required init signatureViktor Sonesten
2021-02-05Minor grammar correctionBarnaby Walters
you -> your
2020-11-19New logo, new textEmil Fresk
2020-11-17Use SVG logo insteadHenrik Tjäder
2020-11-16Add the logo to the book prefaceHenrik Tjäder
2020-11-14Add multilock to the bookEmil Fresk
2020-11-12Disable things which needs more work to be completeHenrik Tjäder
2020-11-12Merge #411bors[bot]
411: Add section about task_local and lock_free r=perlindgren a=AfoHT Co-authored-by: Henrik Tjäder <henrik@tjaders.com>
2020-11-12Merge #408bors[bot]
408: Fixup app/new r=perlindgren a=AfoHT Reference the current example Co-authored-by: Henrik Tjäder <henrik@tjaders.com>
2020-11-12Add static mutHenrik Tjäder
2020-11-12Merge #410bors[bot]
410: resources r=AfoHT a=perlindgren resources Co-authored-by: Per Lindgren <per.lindgren@ltu.se>
2020-11-12Add section about task_local and lock_freeHenrik Tjäder
2020-11-12resources fixPer Lindgren
2020-11-12resourcesPer Lindgren
2020-11-12Merge #409bors[bot]
409: Updated send/sync docs r=AfoHT a=korken89 Co-authored-by: Emil Fresk <emil.fresk@gmail.com>
2020-11-12Updated send/sync docsEmil Fresk
2020-11-12Fixup app/newHenrik Tjäder
2020-11-12Fixed spawn and timer queue docsEmil Fresk
2020-11-12Merge #405 #406bors[bot]
405: Updated migration guide with symmetric locks and new spawn r=AfoHT a=korken89 406: book.toml/by-example/app r=korken89 a=perlindgren Book update Co-authored-by: Emil Fresk <emil.fresk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Per Lindgren <per.lindgren@ltu.se>
2020-11-12book.toml/by-example/appPer Lindgren
2020-11-12Updated migration guide with symmetric locks and new spawnEmil Fresk
2020-11-12Fixup app/tipsHenrik Tjäder
2020-10-29extern taskPer Lindgren
2020-10-23move dispatchers to app argumentPer Lindgren
2020-10-15Made relation between priority and number explicitDion Dokter
When quickly reading through the priorities chapter, I couldn't find in which order the priorities were, so I assumed it was the same as in the hardware. In the cortex-m hardware, interrupts with the **lower** priority number will preempt the other interrupts. RTIC does the reverse, so I think it's good to be more explicit about it.
2020-10-13device path must be absolute; clarifyDaniel Carosone
2020-10-07minor md lints and wording clarificationDaniel Carosone
2020-10-07Merge branch 'master'Daniel Carosone
of https://github.com/rtic-rs/cortex-m-rtic
2020-10-06Merge #173bors[bot]
173: add sandbox example r=AfoHT a=etrombly Added a real world example for my sandbox project. Co-authored-by: Eric Trombly <etrombly@yahoo.com>
2020-10-05Split up migration guides into its own sectionsEmil Fresk
2020-10-05Merge #368bors[bot]
368: Mod over const r=korken89 a=AfoHT Related [RFC](https://github.com/rtic-rs/rfcs/pull/34) Dependent on [rtic-syntax-PR30](https://github.com/rtic-rs/rtic-syntax/pull/30) ~~Currently using my own dev-branch~~ Co-authored-by: Henrik Tjäder <henrik@tjaders.com>
2020-10-03Updated documentation to include the critical section token in initEmil Fresk
2020-10-02Prepare the book for v0.6Henrik Tjäder
2020-10-02Merge #375bors[bot]
375: close console text blocks on a new line r=AfoHT a=dcarosone fixes #369 Co-authored-by: Daniel Carosone <Daniel.Carosone@gmail.com>
2020-10-02minor markdownlintsDaniel Carosone
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-12-29 10:53:20 +0000