diff options
| author | bors[bot] <bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> | 2019-05-01 19:50:50 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors[bot] <bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> | 2019-05-01 19:50:50 +0000 |
| commit | bc024f197929be1ce7dac9e6cbf6672c3980437e (patch) | |
| tree | c0839773ab356bac429cbc69e4f6b5654d162d6e /book/en/src/by-example/resources.md | |
| parent | e6fb2f216fccc09d8e996525dcef3ffb2004f1ec (diff) | |
| parent | ccd7f4586b63841c4bac51f24dc38570c9f89726 (diff) | |
Merge #176
176: implement RFCs 147 and 155, fix #141, etc. r=japaric a=japaric
This PR:
- Implements RFC 147: "all functions must be safe"
- Implements RFC 155: "explicit Context parameter"
- Implements the pending breaking change #141: reject assign syntax in `init`
(which was used to initialize late resources)
- Refactors code generation to make it more readable -- there are no more random
identifiers in the output -- and align it with the book description of RTFM
internals (see PR #175).
- Makes the framework hard depend on `core::mem::MaybeUninit` and thus will
require nightly until that API is stabilized.
- Fixes a ceiling analysis bug where the priority of the system timer was not
considered in the analysis (TODO backport this into the v0.4.x branch).
- Shrinks the size of all the internal queues by turning `AtomicUsize` indices
into `AtomicU8`s.
- Removes the integration with `owned_singleton`.
closes #141
closes #147
closes #155
Additionally:
- This changes CI to push v0.5.x docs to
https://japaric.github.io/rtfm5/book/en/ -- we need to do this because our
official docs are hosted on https://japaric.github.io/cortex-m-rtfm and we
need to keep them on v0.4.x until we release v0.5.0
- I propose that we use the master branch to develop the upcoming v0.5.0.
- I have created a branch v0.4.x for backports; new v0.4.x releases will come
from that branch.
r? @korken89 @texitoi, sorry for doing all the impl work in a single commit --
I know that makes things harder to review for you.
Suggestions for compile-pass and compile-fail tests are welcome
Co-authored-by: Jorge Aparicio <jorge@japaric.io>
Diffstat (limited to 'book/en/src/by-example/resources.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | book/en/src/by-example/resources.md | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/book/en/src/by-example/resources.md b/book/en/src/by-example/resources.md index 17f4d13..06f2f06 100644 --- a/book/en/src/by-example/resources.md +++ b/book/en/src/by-example/resources.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ have enough information to optimize the access to the shared data. The `app` attribute has a full view of the application thus it can optimize access to `static` variables. In RTFM we refer to the `static` variables declared inside the `app` pseudo-module as *resources*. To access a resource the -context (`init`, `idle`, `interrupt` or `exception`) must first declare the +context (`init`, `idle`, `interrupt` or `exception`) one must first declare the resource in the `resources` argument of its attribute. In the example below two interrupt handlers access the same resource. No `Mutex` @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ $ cargo run --example resource The priority of each handler can be declared in the `interrupt` and `exception` attributes. It's not possible to set the priority in any other way because the -runtime takes ownership of the `NVIC` peripheral; it's also not possible to +runtime takes ownership of the `NVIC` peripheral thus it's also not possible to change the priority of a handler / task at runtime. Thanks to this restriction the framework has knowledge about the *static* priorities of all interrupt and exception handlers. @@ -71,10 +71,10 @@ $ cargo run --example lock One more note about priorities: choosing a priority higher than what the device supports (that is `1 << NVIC_PRIO_BITS`) will result in a compile error. Due to -limitations in the language the error is currently far from helpful: it will say -something along the lines of "evaluation of constant value failed" and the span -of the error will *not* point out to the problematic interrupt value -- we are -sorry about this! +limitations in the language the error message is currently far from helpful: it +will say something along the lines of "evaluation of constant value failed" and +the span of the error will *not* point out to the problematic interrupt value -- +we are sorry about this! ## Late resources |
